Custom Search
Showing posts with label indonesia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label indonesia. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

public sector management restructuring concept.

momentarily capital member jakarta soon will feel how obsolence public service that given from only perusaahaan penyedia and electricity energy supplier in indonesia, that is pln. mid up to end july month 2008 this, member jakarta will return to feel electricity putting out according to periodically by pln, with argumentation that is several supplier power station jakarta mangalami damage, so that paso electricity for indonesia capital experience deficit. society as costumer can not do anything, as proper as he is customer should always get optimal service. word ”monopoli ” lah that causes society never berkutik when state-owned corporation give a bad service. then where is function pelindungan consumer which during the time been braced by consumerism law appearance? ”sssttt don't say to whoes, that only completion, law permanent will so cover not bertuan”.

then bagimanakah so that country electricity company management pattern (pln) can be to company genuinely laid society as a(n) customer that must be given a good service from a organization that move in sector public? merely suggestion or a hope, pt. pln as one of [the] company that move at public sector, can adopted service concept prima in course of service that given to society as costumer, or can also apply total concept quality management (tqm). tqm introduce process development, product and service a organization systematicly and continual. approach this is out for involves all related parties and ascertain that experience and their ideas has contribution in quality development. there are some fundamental principles that provide a basis for to approach such, like to promoting environment berfokus in quality

when does service company country electricity (pln) seen to use to approach konsepsi public sector organization theory, so we can threaten in work osborne d. and t. gaebler. osborne d. and t. gaebler (1992) merefleksi this matter is in book reinventing government, where does writer identify 12 public sector organizations characteristics, that is:
1. hold rivalry between penyedia service
2. memberdaya society member with cause the loss of bit towards society
3. measures performance
4. berfokus not in input but in processes that produce outcome
5. guided by their aim (is point of view - not by rule) and law;
6. meredefinisi client as customer;
7. give choice to society member / customer
8. prevent problem before happen than overcoming that problem
9. decentralize authority and carry out partisipative management
10. using efficiently resource to produce money, and not merely misspend it

but such, to menerapan service concept prima, tqm or konsepsi public sector organization theory in body pln, really need a long-range process, go on continually and continual, because culture a organization very difficult to changed because mengindap bureaucracy pathology disease enough acute. factors that form organization culture likes power structure, administrate system, work process, leadership, predisposisi official and potential management practices to are change hindrance. sometimes power importantest at public sector is not found in organization, but a more regular found in larger ones system. tqm can be made part from a strategy to increase commitment lembaga- public institution to give best service to society.

by herbowo sampurno

reference:
haerudin, charity, “reformasi service publik”, bandung institute of governance studies, www. google. com
manan, abdul, 2005, “pemerintah soon make service standardization publik”, time, edition thursday, 24 februaries 2005
mulyadi, deddy, 2004, “mengharap public service optimal”, edition saturday, 07 augusts 2004, daily people idea
shihab, alwi, 2005, “meningkat service quality publik”, indonesia figure dot com (indonesia figure encyclopedia)

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

a work to a friend


a work to a friend formerly ever together
step in young soul

by herbowo sampurno

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

pengentasan poverty in region autonomy wisdom sketch

indonesian government paradigm change has experienced metamorfosis enough dinamic, where does indonesia government system formerly guide in government system sentralistik now turn into decentralization government system that pour in uu no 22 year 1999 about region government.

with memberlakukannya invite to invite number 22 year 1999 about region government be beginning step from a new paradigm in government exertion in indonesia. every local government in indonesia given a authority (authority) very vast, real and bertanggungjawab proportionally to the region each (hendriawan, “penanggulangan poverty in wisdom sketch desentralisasi”).

that thing realized with arrangement, distribution, and national resource utilization, with centre finance counter balance and region as according to region autonomy principles, that is: democracy (democratization), character with society (community participation), pay attention variety (uniformity) region, generalization and justice with kelolanya potential resource at region efficiently and effective.

therefore supposed every region can to optimize resource memilikinya to creat welfare berorientasi in society importance, and realized one of them with government efforts in the case of poverty tackling. with region authority ever greater, so local government with dprd- has responsibility and keleluasan big enough to take important decisions and strategic for effortss overcome poverty and service quality enhanced to the society.

with menerapkannya region autonomy government system, so effortss to overcome poverty and service quality enhanced to poor society more is priority for every region, as region responsibility form towards society, especially in poor society. so that in the end poverty troubleshoots that appear many be responsived, decided and carried out quickly and effective by local government, without having to wait and many depend on instruction from central government.
but practically government transformation from sentralistik be desentralistik by applying region autonomy principles, still to felted less result or the benefit for poor society menyetiap region. when do we review to return principles that be guide in region autonomy execution, one of [the] that is; democracy, generalization and justice, so should poverty level in indonesia longer more decreased, not even on the contrary increase.

based on counting bps, poor citizen percentage in indonesia until year 2003 stills tall permanent, as big as 17,4 percent,s, with larger ones citizen total that is 37,4 million person. even, based on family coordination body number berencana national (bkkbn) in the year 2001, poor family percentage (family prasejahtera and prosperous i) in 2001 achieve 52,07 percent,s or absolut majority family total in indonesia (hamonangan ritonga, “mengapa poverty in indonesia be problem continues? ”).

angka- this number is mengindikasi that poverty tackling programs during the time not yet success overcome poverty problem in indonesia. while in reformation time in this time and in region autonomy era, government many has taked wisdom or programs to mengentas that good poverty is increased also in region level. and clear the result, there is no change significant towards tackling kemiskian, between applications system region autonomy government with previous times, and permanent poverty then increases sharp

by herbowo sampurno

Monday, September 8, 2008

is a leader at this country. . ? ? ?


in this time indonesian in the process of is earning to is democraticing, one of them with mengadakannya also this country leader. but sometimes we are trapped with sweet promises leader candidates moment campaign process. in course of campaign society not at what transformation and how seoarng leader be said good to lead the people. phenomenon that during the time, leaders only teach to how manners lets promise, later we even also difficult to will collected promises. merely me riview several insidents that during berjala direct election process in indonesia. process pilkada or pilpres even be axis from conflict appearance horizontal at society. this matter happens because ketidak siapan from every elemt at this country for election process directly. many informations mentions that conflict appear because:

existence money policies moment process kampnye.
distension voice/kecuarangan moment election process
data collection voters that still blurred the validity
calculation process sometimes at colour deceit
ketidak siapan leaders get beatings
law existence that must it be solution from conflict, even turn around direction can evoke conflict
ketidak tegasan government in take decision

from several examples on knowable that society during the time can not get good study in course of pemiliahn direct. and only impress to follow trend that bloom at that moment society, presumably can give profit a moment. or follow decree in when is he merged into a group. trend this is many at applied by society. not public secret again when moment campaign process, they are that doesn't come because to ikhlasan want to support leader candidate pilihann, but they come berduyung2 because at give amount of fund so that they want to follow. . . here's one of [the] leader example that must it unnecessary be chosen by masayarkat. ”belum be leader teach something that not good, how later if be this country leader? ? ? ”

by herbowo sampurno

Monday, June 30, 2008

globalization influence towards pattern thinks indonesia society

a opinion about:
globalization influence towards pattern thinks indonesia society

globalization era now clear away to enter at all sectors kehiupan indonesian, which is on final will affect towards culture will think indonesia society. in this time pattern thinks indonesia society inclined (not entire) t many aim in western civilization notabane inclined copy in negative behaviour. culture looking-glass with make western civilization as a pattem from civilization progress thinks human. many in this time generani young that imitate life pattern west, with various style and negative the behaviour in kehiodupan a day, or in this time known with the title “anak gaul” memanakan idedalisme we are moment globalization clears away to enter in our life system, does this bentuik from paled it pattern think the rising generation as nation router.

globalization era really can not at justification always bring negative impact for us, but in this case follow me existence from globalization dominanter towards negative, banayk case example that can we find, that is: the hoisterous of free sex melalangan adolescent, in this time assumed not taboo matter again, development poirnografi with sophisticated technology progress many mengonsumsi by child under age freely and easy, level peggunaan prohibitive medicines sanagt pays. we are as third world country menjadika market object from sale obet international prohibitive.

by because that's kitaa necessary build kemvbali foundation pla think kitya, as civilized nation aim router heavy task caretaker as according to our behaviour is as a east. beginning step that must be done follow me try us dig beforehand npotensi-potensi found on banga we, still many potential not yet we dig, actually the mentioned sanagt influential for us for permanent watch over and preserve indonesian culture socio-cultural existence, don't make culture barat(dalam this matter enters to pass globalization era) as pattern pattem thinks, because from pattern will think here's later our behaviour in life everyday according to will not imbued with life pattern buddaya west free. tunjukkaan that is us sebagi nation besarf with keaneka ragaman socio-cultural culture can to compete with them, by applying pattern fikir critical.

nb: until when shall we always be colonized by western civilization, now moment it to get up, prove us mamapu! ! ! !

14 junes 2005 5 via 25 evening minutes at ukm watchfulness
a opinion about:
globalization influence towards pattern thinks indonesia society

globalization era now clear away to enter at all sectors kehiupan indonesian, which is on final will affect towards culture will think indonesia society. in this time pattern thinks indonesia society inclined (not entire) t many aim in western civilization notabane inclined copy in negative behaviour. culture looking-glass with make western civilization as a pattem from civilization progress thinks human. many in this time generani young that imitate life pattern west, with various style and negative the behaviour in kehiodupan a day, or in this time known with the title “anak gaul” memanakan idedalisme we are moment globalization clears away to enter in our life system, does this bentuik from paled it pattern think the rising generation as nation router.

globalization era really can not at justification always bring negative impact for us, but in this case follow me existence from globalization dominanter towards negative, banayk case example that can we find, that is: the hoisterous of free sex melalangan adolescent, in this time assumed not taboo matter again, development poirnografi with sophisticated technology progress many mengonsumsi by child under age freely and easy, level peggunaan prohibitive medicines sanagt pays. we are as third world country menjadika market object from sale obet international prohibitive.

by because that's kitaa necessary build kemvbali foundation pla think kitya, as civilized nation aim router heavy task caretaker as according to our behaviour is as a east. beginning step that must be done follow me try us dig beforehand npotensi-potensi found on banga we, still many potential not yet we dig, actually the mentioned sanagt influential for us for permanent watch over and preserve indonesian culture socio-cultural existence, don't make culture barat(dalam this matter enters to pass globalization era) as pattern pattem thinks, because from pattern will think here's later our behaviour in life everyday according to will not imbued with life pattern buddaya west free. tunjukkaan that is us sebagi nation besarf with culture socio-cultural variety can to compete with them, by applying pattern fikir critical.

nb: until when shall we always be colonized by western civilization, now moment it to get up, prove us can! ! ! !
Justify Full
14 junes 2005 blows 5 via 25 evening minutes at ukm watchfulness

campus power policies

tread on foot is internationalised campus, will mean to make provision against consequence that be accepted from every decision that will bring this foot will step. where does campus world be caned to execute jungle, menjejali by penghuni-penghuni that has intellectual ability really amaze, when and where lure into a trap this step into it the group communities strength (strength of group community) variously, good that done formally up to use gimmick strategy. then how to to escape from the mentioned? bothing;there is no definitive answer, but sometimes student university apathetic character t proved can to avoid all temptations. but remember, that not best solution with only can to be a true onlooker. may be we beed only one, that is a direction instruction (compass) that can show where foot will step to out from jungle so that not trapped mendalamnya, but sometimes effort be in vain moment flatter to persuade it membuta this eye to has reacheded for fame camouflage memilikinya, one of them policies kekusaan campus (politics power of campus), always equiped by fame package and the authority to have the authority, but that thing also that can lure into a trap us in crisis still not finished up to hand fist that speak. that's campus world life description in a flash always demand every the individual to posed netralitas afektif in evaluate and determine the choice.

policies constellation arena, really not only happen in country stage or government, campus environment even also can be a replica from policies world truthfully, student university as campus politicians even also not lose the great with sepakterjang this nations politicians, mutual scrambling power by a function, power and fame later will enrich their self self. campus policies atmosphere temperature heat day after day more will increase in line with will approach second student university great election time. this condition is a scenery that interesting to watched, when with clearly we witness student university policies coup arena pros and cons description (power of student politics), so that contention arena clear emitted and politic tactics game that perfominged by student university intellectual class, both for kasat also not eye? ?

education about policies really best known early on, and surely for the rising generation likes student university, but why does campus policies that be can be called also as policies world replica sesunggu, always reflect matters negative from policies game side, so that doesn't happen a balance proportion in campus policies constellation arena. policies wrestling very identical with coup between group or group, cenderumg allow all manner to get a camouflage authority.
borrow max horkheimer from mazab frankfurt about ratio and rationality (eclipse of reason, 2004-continuum international publishing group academy), education makes educated class adopteds subjective reasoning (subjective reasoning) in thinks and do on" only considering situation and the norm self" . in subjective reasoning, fungsionalitas be what a brainchild and that action is reasonable and acceptable or not. merunut concept horkheimer, education should menumbuh objective reasoning (objective reasoning), principle universalitas as way of thinking standard and act that overcome lokalitas, identity, and individual/group importance. (agus suwignyo, education and pelibatan policies, http: /www. unisosdem. org/). indicator and or limitation about campus policies truth concept which during the time used by student university very beranekaragam and not absolute in character, because still to influenced by factor-faktor that good student university idealism has individual also group. knowable, that is amount of conflict that deliver student university in scope student governance at college one of [the] the cause because campus policies coup (politics power of campus) by sprinkling elite student university policies, then and then differ mutual memperebut a camouflage authority to defend keberlangsungan the regime each. a part student university till now still not yet can look at a difference as born it democracy, good that is shaped opinion, principle and or perception difference in policies cauldron.

konsepsi power policies such as those which presented by a philosopher from country florence that is machiavelli that present the theory in one of [the] the work have a title ilprincipe (power policies). he propose what real must be done by a administrator to grab, defend, and avoid to lost it power by using all manner. they say this book is a holy/handle book by menctator world, begin from napoleon up to administrators menctator europe in world war ii, like stalin and hitler. policies power concepts that presented by machevelli, awarely or not adopted and begin to applied to return by campus intellectual class in this time, as trik they use to get support, begin from campaign under cover, mobilization mass bew comer is internationalised campus, do lobbies deliver elite policies, conspiracy up to manners indisposed to defend a regime in student governance practised.

a little differ from what presented machiavelli in the power policies, hegemony concept follows gramsci, in selections from prison notebooks (1991) 'hegemony concept not only related to policies domination, shaped 'strength (force), but also with domination via culture, belong language domination. in a power system not only need “kekuatan”, but need also public 'acceptance (public consent) that got via cultural leadership mechanism', belong language leadership. (yasraf amir piliang; language, policies, and nationalism) so that it is not strange now student university to simplify the policies purposes inclined put forward rhetoric ability mass, when be payed accurately like a supertitous formula that make us washed away insides the influence. really manner very hair-raising when every moment we are menyuguhi doctrines sometimes not yet proved the truth, but can influence our patterned thinking and inclined has activity subversive that is policies movement that assumed as disturbance in has aim overthrows valid government, by using manners oppose against hokum (prof. dr. soejono s. dictionary sosilogi)

when return to see policies atmosphere mobility height in the world of campus, knowable great election be made as arena unjuk policies strength tooth sprinkling individual, group and or student university organization, good that is that in direction scope, also university. student university that want to get esteemed position in student university organization levels mutual competes to interesting sympathy as much as possible, especially that be their target object is campus proletarian class, where inclined has apathetic and neutral in menyikapi carut-marut campus policies dynamics that why do they wanted so much? , because most of campus proletarian class doesn't has back anchor to give the voice right. therefore mobilization ability and rhetoric mass wanted in this case so much, they are mutual convince one another, that choice for them best choice, sometimes such as those which mentioned previous that in the case of inisemua manner can be allowed, begin from strategy incites, criticize, budge to nudge, distribution strategy pamphlet can (without there name/status not clear), lobbies with petinggi student university, up to game black campaign be scenery usually at that moment, they are mutual drop one same other just for grab a dais the jawara elite campus, later will have with kebijakan-kebijakan a yearlong to the fore, unknowingly what truth from responsibility mengembannya.

ironic really when does student university now only the thinking focus in campus policies, how with tridarma college which during the time be slogan, must be achieved by every student university as indicator within reason somebody be be called with word “mahasiswa, young intellectual class, agent of chance dll”? ? ? . sometimes they are too passionate play with campus policies, up to there are some from college occupants that forget the duty as front base in will voice society aspiration which during the time oppressed by hands policies administrators bermental “tempe”. besides coup indisposed mengampus have come to culture then preserved and always defended since formerly up to in this time.

recall exhibition ketoprak joke, has character and the task each in run the mission, where does their aim only one, that is how console the onlookers with their foolish behaviour. natural when later student university that sit membangku this nation bureaucrat, shrewder again will perfoming the policies character with will allow all manner to will achieve individual aim and the group. this only cusorily description from campus power policies, interesting to watched and more interesting to mengritisi….

by herbowo sampurno
22 februaries 2006,00.30 wib, port floats

Monday, June 16, 2008

policies economy in viewpoint

since crisis 1997, so everybody realize how kaitnya economies problems with policies problems. how hit regime suharto very tight related with hit indonesian economics. economy crisis that in indonesia be impact from global capitalist influence, where does economy stability condition and indonesia policies that is presenting on course most under. this crisis is not gets international globalization influence that brings fresh wind for domination understands neo-liberal berorientasi in market freedom and profit. doesn't less important again caused by government wisdom implementation failure which is on bew order period time more memfokus self in economy infrastructure development merely regardless of the impact for societal social life.

tall economy growth at that moment only is appearance shadow for many indonesia society. and when does that system collapse, people only is enjoying appearance economy growth is being forced to is liquidating policies social cost that is experiencing great belief crisis in indonesia. potential foreign capital that investment in indonesia in the end only be heavy load for people not on the contrary as power penumbuhan indonesia society strength. therefore can be watchinged manifestly, that is a large part alive indonesia citizen under poverty line as absolute consequence from world capitalism influence, with escorted by the increasing of act criminality and difference social in society. authority abuse by bureaucracies actors and monopolinya market by segolongan elite that dominate vital production factors, then maked use by capitalists to scratch profit as great as possible pass market monopoly, so that aggravate economy social order that there.

but actually approach ekonomi-politik far than only connection between economy and also configuration institute and rumors good-governance from world bank. ekonomi–politik approach peel/ analyze connection pattern and importance pattern various group and class that implied in various modern economy change process, especially capital economy (capitalism economy).

as we know that policies economy is influenced by policies factor, social, economy, and culture. in corruption disease policies area, collusion, and nepotism many menjangkiti leaders and decision taker at government resort. abroad debt is target and opportunity to do corruption so that project - only be economy movement simbol inefficient. in global transaction economy area random without calculates password power ability in country, crisis, abroad debt berujung in belief crisis, so that produce economy structure inequitable and harm publics. this be direct cause from national economy bankruptcy.

change problem and social transformation from various class and group along tight related history with how go on it capital fertilizing process and wealth accumulation at society. this matter is longer more creats difference between various group/class at society, that is: rich class and poor class; peasantry and group industrialis; worker group and boss group; entrepreneur class and labourer class. this policies economy analysis, that is dependability deepens between relations sosial-ekonomi with power (policies).

in rights economy base economy can not be run thoroughly this matter can be seen from the hoisterous of cases towards rights abuse base economy. like phk mass that done by pt indonesia sky merngakibat quantity workers that lose the work eye. the economy situation not also membaik-baik, especially because all the policies situation. commonly, person now understand connection between economy with policies. even now orthodox economists, begin to realize the economy science limitedness and begin to put into policies factor to depth. can not again only mengutak-atik macro economy instrument, monetary and fiscal; but also must mengutak-atik democracy problem, penega ham or policies institutionalization process.

by herbowo sampurno