public sector management restructuring concept.

momentarily capital member jakarta soon will feel how obsolence public service that given from only perusaahaan penyedia and electricity energy supplier in indonesia, that is pln. mid up to end july month 2008 this, member jakarta will return to feel electricity putting out according to periodically by pln, with argumentation that is several supplier power station jakarta mangalami damage, so that paso electricity for indonesia capital experience deficit. society as costumer can not do anything, as proper as he is customer should always get optimal service. word ”monopoli ” lah that causes society never berkutik when state-owned corporation give a bad service. then where is function pelindungan consumer which during the time been braced by consumerism law appearance? ”sssttt don't say to whoes, that only completion, law permanent will so cover not bertuan”.

then bagimanakah so that country electricity company management pattern (pln) can be to company genuinely laid society as a(n) customer that must be given a good service from a organization that move in sector public? merely suggestion or a hope, pt. pln as one of [the] company that move at public sector, can adopted service concept prima in course of service that given to society as costumer, or can also apply total concept quality management (tqm). tqm introduce process development, product and service a organization systematicly and continual. approach this is out for involves all related parties and ascertain that experience and their ideas has contribution in quality development. there are some fundamental principles that provide a basis for to approach such, like to promoting environment berfokus in quality

when does service company country electricity (pln) seen to use to approach konsepsi public sector organization theory, so we can threaten in work osborne d. and t. gaebler. osborne d. and t. gaebler (1992) merefleksi this matter is in book reinventing government, where does writer identify 12 public sector organizations characteristics, that is:
1. hold rivalry between penyedia service
2. memberdaya society member with cause the loss of bit towards society
3. measures performance
4. berfokus not in input but in processes that produce outcome
5. guided by their aim (is point of view - not by rule) and law;
6. meredefinisi client as customer;
7. give choice to society member / customer
8. prevent problem before happen than overcoming that problem
9. decentralize authority and carry out partisipative management
10. using efficiently resource to produce money, and not merely misspend it

but such, to menerapan service concept prima, tqm or konsepsi public sector organization theory in body pln, really need a long-range process, go on continually and continual, because culture a organization very difficult to changed because mengindap bureaucracy pathology disease enough acute. factors that form organization culture likes power structure, administrate system, work process, leadership, predisposisi official and potential management practices to are change hindrance. sometimes power importantest at public sector is not found in organization, but a more regular found in larger ones system. tqm can be made part from a strategy to increase commitment lembaga- public institution to give best service to society.

by herbowo sampurno

reference:
haerudin, charity, “reformasi service publik”, bandung institute of governance studies, www. google. com
manan, abdul, 2005, “pemerintah soon make service standardization publik”, time, edition thursday, 24 februaries 2005
mulyadi, deddy, 2004, “mengharap public service optimal”, edition saturday, 07 augusts 2004, daily people idea
shihab, alwi, 2005, “meningkat service quality publik”, indonesia figure dot com (indonesia figure encyclopedia)

pengentasan poverty in region autonomy wisdom sketch

indonesian government paradigm change has experienced metamorfosis enough dinamic, where does indonesia government system formerly guide in government system sentralistik now turn into decentralization government system that pour in uu no 22 year 1999 about region government.

with memberlakukannya invite to invite number 22 year 1999 about region government be beginning step from a new paradigm in government exertion in indonesia. every local government in indonesia given a authority (authority) very vast, real and bertanggungjawab proportionally to the region each (hendriawan, “penanggulangan poverty in wisdom sketch desentralisasi”).

that thing realized with arrangement, distribution, and national resource utilization, with centre finance counter balance and region as according to region autonomy principles, that is: democracy (democratization), character with society (community participation), pay attention variety (uniformity) region, generalization and justice with kelolanya potential resource at region efficiently and effective.

therefore supposed every region can to optimize resource memilikinya to creat welfare berorientasi in society importance, and realized one of them with government efforts in the case of poverty tackling. with region authority ever greater, so local government with dprd- has responsibility and keleluasan big enough to take important decisions and strategic for effortss overcome poverty and service quality enhanced to the society.

with menerapkannya region autonomy government system, so effortss to overcome poverty and service quality enhanced to poor society more is priority for every region, as region responsibility form towards society, especially in poor society. so that in the end poverty troubleshoots that appear many be responsived, decided and carried out quickly and effective by local government, without having to wait and many depend on instruction from central government.
but practically government transformation from sentralistik be desentralistik by applying region autonomy principles, still to felted less result or the benefit for poor society menyetiap region. when do we review to return principles that be guide in region autonomy execution, one of [the] that is; democracy, generalization and justice, so should poverty level in indonesia longer more decreased, not even on the contrary increase.

based on counting bps, poor citizen percentage in indonesia until year 2003 stills tall permanent, as big as 17,4 percent,s, with larger ones citizen total that is 37,4 million person. even, based on family coordination body number berencana national (bkkbn) in the year 2001, poor family percentage (family prasejahtera and prosperous i) in 2001 achieve 52,07 percent,s or absolut majority family total in indonesia (hamonangan ritonga, “mengapa poverty in indonesia be problem continues? ”).

angka- this number is mengindikasi that poverty tackling programs during the time not yet success overcome poverty problem in indonesia. while in reformation time in this time and in region autonomy era, government many has taked wisdom or programs to mengentas that good poverty is increased also in region level. and clear the result, there is no change significant towards tackling kemiskian, between applications system region autonomy government with previous times, and permanent poverty then increases sharp

by herbowo sampurno

culture sociology

culture is all results from work, taste and society aim. culture problem is of vital importance to studied more deepen because culture and human society is duumvirate is not dissociated. culture term comes from sanskrit word buddhayah that be plural form from word buddhi that mean mind or mind. culture come from word latin colere that mean to cultivate and do (soerjono soekanto, 1987, ”sosiologi a pengantar”, press hawk, jakarta).


culture will be human erudition that believed the truth by concerned and muffled with muffle feeling and human emotions with be source for good something that evaluation system and bad, valuable something that or not, clean something that or dirty, and as it. this matter can happen because that culture be muffled by moral values, source from moral values in alive opinion and in ethic or ethics system that has by every human (geertz, 1973b), (www. google. com).

follow andreas eppink, culture or culture contains overall explanation, value, norm, science with overallly social structures, religious, and others, addition again all intellectual statement and artistic that be individuality a society. culture is all human man expressive expression aspects that is realized in vinicity nature. this matter can physically also way of thinking. culture word can mean: 1) idea, intelligence, concept, 2) customs and traditions, 3) everything human expression, 4) something that has been habit and difficult changed and 5) art, culture, clothes (www. wikipedia. com).

many opinions scholars about culture elements, by c. kluckhohn analyzed with indicate in scholar opinions kernel, , conclude culture element existence that assumed as cultural-universals, that is: .
a) device and human life equipment
b) alive livelihood and economy systems
c) social system
d) language
e) artistry
f) erudition system
g) religion
(widyosiswoyo, s, 1996, ”il culture dasar”, ghalia indonesia, jakarta)

culture good for human, that is to protect self from nature, regulate to relations to deliver human and as container than every feeling human. bothing;there is no static culture; every has dynamics. movement be effect [of] society movement that be culture container. besides found also the happening of culture acculturation. acculturation is where a human group with a culture certain, aimed with elements from a different foreign culture in such a manner, so that that foreign culture elements is phlegmatically laun is accepted and cultivated to into culture self, without causes to lost it itself culture personality (soerjono soekanto, 1987, ”sosiologi a pengantar”, press hawk, jakarta)